Re: Receiver Recommendation Please

"david273129" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.recreation.radio.hardware.yaesu.vr-500
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--- In [email protected], "Rod Bradley" <bradrodusa@...> wrote:
>
> Hello all, I am new to this group and I am a falconer and I use a 
small
> telemetry transmitter to track my birds. I have a regular falconry 
receiver
> mounted on a yagi antenna but it is very bulky and tiresome to 
carry around
> all day in the field. I hunt ground game like rabbits and 
squirrels with a
> hawk that does not range very far, normally they only get lost 
when down on
> a kill either in tall grass and heavy cover. The transmitters that 
I
> currently use are at 216.045 and 216.047 MHz. Other common 
frequencies used
> for bird tracking transmitters are 151,173, 216,218 MHz. I know a 
few people
> who are using Icom R-10 receivers to track their transmitters with 
very good

HI

 The VR500 certainly covers the frequency you specify. it will also 
tune down to increments of .05kc in all modes. I think it would do 
whay you want. You may need to use an antenna resonant on the 
frequencies you want to use. I cannot vouch for the other radios you 
mentioned but no doubt someone else can.

Good luck,

Dave G0BVV
> results, but these are no longer available. Does the VR-500 cover 
the same
> frequency range? Is there any other economical option? Will the 
Yaesu
> VR-120D or IC R-5 work on these frequencies. I really like the 
smaller ones
> because they fit in a shirt pocket but I have been told that they 
will not
> fine tune to the level that I need to program these frequencies. 
Do you know
> of any good used R-10 or VR-500 units available? I would like to 
stay
> between $100 and $200 if possible. I think that I might also enjoy 
using the
> scanner capabilities during the off-season from falconry. Thanks 
for any
> help you can offer.
> 
>  
> 
> Rod Bradley
> 
> Duncanville, TX
> 
> 214-207-2481 cell
> 
> 972-296-7546 fax
> 
> e-mail: bradrod@...
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.