Re: Re: New VR 500 & handy reference sheet (s)?- Question
[email protected] Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:23:46 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.recreation.radio.hardware.yaesu.vr-500 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree, using the VR-500 in AM narrow could reduce the hiss, as it would narrow down the passband you're receiving. I do surprisingly well here in the city using a duck for MW reception, and even the powerful SW broadcasters. But like you I have to be holding the radio for good signal strength. This isn't a problem since that's how I generally use the VR-500, as a handheld rig. Chuck Quoting voip10 <[email protected]>: > Hi Jimmy, > > You are correct re the lack of ferrite rod antenna! The rubber duck > antenna suplied with the radio is extremely inefficient for > reception of medium wave signals, and pretty much all of shortwave, > too. The Yaesu-supplied antenna is "resonant" at around 150MHz and > is reasonably good for receiving signals on the 2m amateur band and > other signals in that region of the RF spectrum. It's good fun to > experiment. It is possible to get ferrite rods with coils wound for > medium and long wave from several suppliers (e.g. Maplin in the UK) > and medium-wave tuning capacitors, too. There'll be plenty of simple > circuits on the internet that could be built in very little time. > You could also try a simple dipole, with each leg around a couple of > metres or so in length, still electrically short, compared to > medium wave-lengths but a good deal better than the rubber duck. > The antenna doesn't have to be elaborately strung out, either. One > leg could be laid across a table and the other along the ground. > > Using narrow AM would improve things slightly, especially if there > is a lot of interference from signals on neighbouring frequencies, > but reception would sound slightly more "muffled" because narrow AM > will reduce the audio frequency response. > > Voi > > --- In [email protected], "bluesea805@..." <bluesea805@...> wrote: >> >> >> Does switching to AM "Narrow" help to get better local AM reception >> ? I'd like to know this, because so far, this radio is getting horrible >> reception (very faint with a lot of background noise) of a nearby AM >> station that otherwise comes in loud & clear through even the cheapest >> of radios I have in the house. It gets better only if I hold it in my >> hand, becoming a Human antenna. I hope your AM Narrow option helps, >> because I'm already very disappointed if that's the best AM reception I >> can get out of this radio, Doe you think this is largely due to the fact >> that it does not have a built-in Ferrite bar antenna, like some other >> radios do ? Thanks, >> >> Jimmy >> --- In [email protected], comtron@ wrote: >> > >> > Jimmy, >> > >> > Welcome to the group. While I can't help on whether there are >> > different versions of the VR-500 (though I've never heard this to be >> > the case), I can point you to this easy tip on enabling AM-narrow mode >> > on the VR-500 (if only all wideband handhelds had this underlying >> > capability!) : >> > >> > Re: NAM mode >> > >> > Here's how its done. >> > >> > To enable the hidden Narrow AM option on the VR-500 simply do the >> > following..... >> > >> > You unlock the hidden menu options #33 "User Port" >> > >> > and #34 "Narrow AM" by pressing and holding four >> > >> > buttons while switching the radio on: 0,3,5 and 9. >> > >> > Menu #33 "User Port" does nothing, but the #34 >> > >> > "Narrow AM" option is very handy and works very well. >> > >> > Enjoy >> > >> > >> > I have yet to try doing this myself...to be honest I haven't had an >> > urgent need to narrow the reception on my 500...I've done well just >> > as-is. But it's great to have this available! >> > >> > Chuck >> > >> > Quoting "bluesea805@" bluesea805@: >> > >> > > >> > > Hello everyone, >> > > >> > > I'm brand new here, my very 1st post- Hello to you all.Thank you for >> > > accepting me into the Group. I just took delivery of a brand new >> Yeasu >> > > VR 500 & am very anxious to learn how to program it to scan my >> favorite >> > > local frequencies. Having already owned several scanners (Regent >> home >> > > base unit, Radio Shack Pro 94, Alinco DJ-X7 and now this one) you'd >> > > think I'd already be quite familiar with how to go about this >> tedious >> > > task.However, at least for me it seems that each reciever has a >> > > different way of going about things & furthermore, the manuals that >> try >> > > to explain what to do aren't always as explicit as you'd like them >> to >> > > be- do you know what I mean ? >> > > >> > > Therefore, I noticed the handy Reference sheets that are on the >> > > Files section of this Forum. Since the posts are dated back from >> > > 2000-2001 or so, I was wondering if these sheets will still apply to >> the >> > > brand new 2009 model VR 500 and other recent years of this same >> unit, or >> > > are there new features & different button pushes on the new(er) >> versions >> > > of this unit that will not apply to the reference sheet ? >> > > >> > > Thank you & I look forward to sharing with you the joys of owning >> > > such a versatile little Reciever- SSB capability & all ! >> > > >> > > >> > > Jimmy >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. >> > >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.