RE: split database with blast

"Ryan Golhar" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.biology.informatics.clusters
Organization Informatics Institute of UMDNJ
Message-ID <5B63DC0CC5B54527885A60DACA1EFCAC@PICO>
Is top-posting allowed here?  

I believe NCBI does this as well.  I recall talking to them about this when
I visited their facilities once.  Have you tried emailing ncbi-helpdesk?
Someone their should be able to tell you what parameters you need to use to
calculate the correct e-value.  bl2seq allows you to set a theoretical db
size, so I'm sure blast will allow you to as well.

Ryan


> Hi Daniel,
> It is non-trivial to get correct effective database sizes 
> with NCBI BLAST, as it involves processing both query 
> sequences and database sequences. You're best bet is to use a 
> package that can split the databases and return correct 
> e-values. mpiBLAST  is one, but dBlast is another if for some 
> unfathomable reason you don't like mpiBLAST. 
> However, depending on what you're doing, e-value differences 
> may not matter. In my personal opinion, there is no 
> difference between e-36 and e-40, so the differences you are 
> talking about are negligible. -Lucas
> 
> On Tuesday, November 21, 2006 at 15:41 -0800, Daniel Xavier 
> de Sousa wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hi for all,
> > 
> > I need some help about Parallel BLAST. I will bee happy if 
> anyone help 
> > me.
> > I have worked with parallel BLAST using split database. 
> > 
> > I don?t have problem to execute on part of database  and statistics 
> > values  when use WUBLAST, because  use DBRECMAX and DBRECMIN 
> > parameters and I execute Blast like virtual split database, 
> get just 
> > the piece of all database, and the e-value get right.
> > 
> > But I really want do everything work in NCBI_BLAST. I know the 
> > solution of  mpiBLAST and the list of GI number file. But, these 
> > solutions aren?t so good. The first because the source of 
> BLAST have 
> > to change. And the second, because require that you use GI 
> numbers in 
> > the FASTA identifier.
> > 
> > So, my  question is:
> > 
> > 1)      Somebody
> > knows some else solution to run process blast on split 
> database, and 
> > not changes the e-value with relation to run whole database?
> > 
> > If not, the difference between e-value with whole database 
> and part of 
> > database (using the parameter ?z and ?Y of  ncbi_blast) is very 
> > important?
> > 
> > Example, I processed one sequence with whole database and 
> just part of 
> > database, using parameter ?z, the result was:
> > 
> >                                                 (evalue)NR  
>                                 (evalue) NR/2 using ?z
> > SeqQuery       Seq1DB                4e-66                  
>                                 6e-66
> > SeqQuery       Seq2DB                4e-38                  
>                                 5e-38
> > 
> >             This difference is relevant?
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Daniel Xavier ? PUC ? Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.