Re: Suggestions requested on HPC.
George Magklaras <[email protected]> Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:53:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.biology.informatics.clusters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I can't give you specific suggestions unless you tell me a bit about the scale of your envisaged molecular modeling and docking (size of data set, number of cores, etc). So, in a very abstract way, my view is that performance is often independent of the large brands and more dependent on the local sysadmin resources and how good they work with the work developers. This is true for small to moderate scale (500 cores say) installation and for filesystems whose size can fit well within the limits of DAS (directly attached storage, as opposed to fiber channel and other storage solutions). You could find very good deals with independent smaller scale hardware manufacturers at a fraction of the cost of the big boys. However, if your envisaged scale exceeds the moderate level and/or your simulation requires some sort of bespoke interconnect, then the big boys might have more resources to deal with annoying driver issues and help your local resources get more juice out of your setup. GM -- -- George Magklaras Senior Computer Systems Engineer/UNIX Systems Administrator EMBnet Technical Management Board The Biotechnology Centre of Oslo, University of Oslo http://folk.uio.no/georgios Lijo wrote: > Hi, > > Our lab plans to erect a HPC for molecular modeling and docking. Now we face > flood of executives from different high profile brands with their > customized efficiency. > Does the performance is free from the brands? > > Expecting suggestions ! > > Lijo M Antony >