Re: pipeline pilot vs. taverna?
"Wilfred Li" <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:15:15 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.biology.informatics.clusters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It seems that if your users are already using Accelrys tools, pipeline pilot would be a better choice, and the support you may receive. Mostly depends on your budget. PP also support web services, like Taverna. Cheers, Wilfred -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hershel Safer Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 7:01 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Bioclusters] pipeline pilot vs. taverna? Hi folks, Without meaning to incite any flame wars, I would like to ask about the relative advantages of Pipeline Pilot and Taverna. To be more specific, I am joining a startup drug-discovery company, which will use a combination of computational and wet-lab chemistry. The computational chemists will use a lot of Accelrys tools, as well as software from other vendors. We are looking for a tool to automate computational workflows, and the leading candidates seem to be Pipeline Pilot and Taverna. >From your experience, what are the strengths of the two tools? Does Pipeline Pilot operate better with the Accelrys tools because they're from the same company? Thanks, Hershel Safer _______________________________________________ Bioclusters maillist - [email protected] http://www.bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters