Re: Interspecies differential expression of orthologs with Edger
"Tim Triche, Jr." <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:45:34 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAC+N9BWLi0sGwUaOWUv3sK4+y7cDwZcqWBajX5FFGnd=_UGsWQ@mail.gmail.com> |
I've been wondering a similar thing: suppose I use transcripts per million (TPM) as a coherent estimate of abundance and feed it to limma/voom in order to fit a multi-factorial blocked model in a poorly annotated organism (draft genome and txome, but orthologs poorly characterized thus far). It appears to work properly in human and mouse samples (i.e. the top hits are reasonable); is it sensible to generalize to non-model or poorly-annotated organisms in this fashion? Probably something that could be puzzled out given time, but since the authors have likely addressed this before, a reference would be great. Statistics is the grammar of science. Karl Pearson <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grammar_of_Science> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:50 AM, assaf www <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Edger developers and users, > > I would like to compare transcription levels of orthologous genes belonging > to different species, in order to find significant species-dependent > changes in transcription levels. I though of using Edger for such > analysis. > Specifically, I have the read-counts data for several RNA-Seq samples, for > 2 different species (e.g., read counts produced by Htseq-count, and Rsem). > > I would like to ask: > 1) because Edger uses CPM values, which are not normalized by gene-length, > and because the length of orthologous genes differ, it would lead to a > serious length-dependet bias, and I would ask how to normalize for that. > 2) if the above length-bias can be eliminated, and the compared genes are > true orthologs, are you aware of any other major problems that should be > considered in the above case ? > > > Thanks in advance, > Assaf > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > [email protected] > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioconductor mailing list [email protected] https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor