Re: HTSeq-Count
Steve Lianoglou <lianoglou.steve-RuTDbSqP/[email protected]> Fri, 5 Sep 2014 09:35:10 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHA9McNrKXnqp_0yo04wyCRRhy9Sa5HScMjohe-e9Zb2K2KxOA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Julia, On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Julia [guest] <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > I am new to the field of seq and performed a RIP-Seq experiment using HTSeq count as counter. > I get now the following (using union, but doesn´t look better for interesection_strict): > __no_feature 1503377 > __ambiguous 490772 > __too_low_aQual 0 > __not_aligned 0 > __alignment_not_unique 5277314 > > When I sum up counts for all genes, I get 3227845. > > The number for __no_feature, __ambiguous, __alignment_not_unique look very high. > > Does somebody have an idea for that? While I haven't worked with RIP-seq data myself, I do have some experience with HITS-CLIP and PAR-CLIP, which I believe are quite similar (at least in principle) -- these experiments must incredibly difficult to pull off, however, because I'd say most of these types of datasets that came my way were notoriously/incredibly noisy. This is just to say the problem you are seeing may not be an informatics problem, and could (quite possibly) be an experimental one. -steve -- Steve Lianoglou Computational Biologist Genentech _______________________________________________ Bioconductor mailing list [email protected] https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor