Re: RNA-seq differentially expressed gene finding methods
Son Pham <spham-xrR1t/[email protected]> Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:31:25 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKUmEKEATfVuEU6MXwtqyfHVxOQBy=TRhY0NJA3MWZ2D0-6KrQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Thank you Richard, Devon and Paul for very insight answers. I completely agree that the approach I raised above is inappropriate when the group size is small (3, 4...). But when the group size is large enough ( > 20 or 30), the sampling distribution of the mean will be (closed to) normally distributed, and that is why I believe that the t-test is ok. -Son. On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Paul Geeleher <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Son, > > My understanding is that the approach you describe could be considered > valid for large enough numbers of samples, however, RNA-seq > experiments will typically have smaller numbers (<30) samples per > condition, meaning that a t-test is not valid (because RNA-seq data > isn't normally distributed). However, while I don't think that a > t-test is "invalid" given enough samples, its very difficult to > justify using such a method when much better powered methods have been > invented specifically for this type of data. > > Paul > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Richard Friedman > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Son, > > > > The t-test assumes a normal distribution, > > which is appropriate for continous variables. RNAseq > > data deals with counts (discrete entities). A negative binomial > distribution > > (EdgeR, Deseq) or a mean dependent variance (VOOM) > > is much more approriate. Also the 3 methods mentioned > > above estimate variablity better with information from all genes > > using empirical Bayesian methods, than does the one-gene > > at-a-time frequentist t-test. > > > > Best wishes, > > Rich > > Richard A. Friedman, PhD > > Associate Research Scientist, > > Biomedical Informatics Shared Resource > > Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center (HICCC) > > Lecturer, > > Department of Biomedical Informatics (DBMI) > > Educational Coordinator, > > Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (C2B2)/ > > National Center for Multiscale Analysis of Genomic Networks (MAGNet)/ > > Columbia Department of Systems Biology > > Room 824 > > Irving Cancer Research Center > > Columbia University > > 1130 St. Nicholas Ave > > New York, NY 10032 > > (212)851-4765 (voice) > > [email protected] > > http://friedman.c2b2.columbia.edu/ > > > > "There is nothing in my Contemporary Jewish Literature course that is > > either contemporary, Jewish, or literature". > > > > -Rose Friedman, age 17 > > > > > > On Sep 5, 2014, at 12:44 PM, Son Pham wrote: > > > >> Dear all, > >> I know that we have quite very good packages (edgeR, deseq) that > calculate > >> the list of differentially expressed genes in 2 conditions (with > >> replicates) from raw counts. But I do not know what is wrong with the > >> following simple approach (and whether other people have been using it): > >> > >> 1. Get the (estimated) tpm/fpkm for each gene in each sample > >> 2. Do a t-test for two groups on each gene. > >> 3. Adjust the p value for multiple tests (p-adj) > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Son. > >> > >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Bioconductor mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > >> Search the archives: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bioconductor mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > > Search the archives: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > > > > -- > Dr. Paul Geeleher, PhD > Section of Hematology-Oncology > Department of Medicine > The University of Chicago > 900 E. 57th St., > KCBD, Room 7144 > Chicago, IL 60637 > -- > www.bioinformaticstutorials.com > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioconductor mailing list [email protected] https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor