Re: Interaction categorical/continuous variable DESeq2
Wolfgang Huber <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:54:34 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Cher Hugo sorry if I missed something, but why not fit the model with interactions an= d test for the coefficient of the =91X' main effect? (see arguments =91name=92, =91contrast=92 of the =91results=92 function). What you propose below seems not wrong, but perhaps unnecessarily complicat= ed. Best wishes Wolfgang Il giorno 15 Sep 2014, alle ore 15:41, Hugo Varet <[email protected]> h= a scritto: > Dear list, dear Mike Love, > = > I am using DESeq2 to model counts from an unusual type of experiment and = I have a question about the strategy I employed. The experiment consisted i= n sequencing 33 samples for which we have the following information: > - group (16 samples from group A and 17 from group B) > - a continuous variable X almost uniform (variable of interest) > = > I have to add the group to the design formula because I know it has a str= ong effect on the counts. Then, as my goal is to detect genes which vary wi= th the continous variable X in the same way within both groups A and B, I w= ant to exclude genes for which there is an interaction between group and X.= The design is thus ~ group + X + group:X and I used the following lines to= test the interaction: > = > dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData=3Dcounts, colData=3Dtarget, desig= n =3D ~ group + X + group:X) > dds <- estimateSizeFactors(dds) > dds <- estimateDispersions(dds) > dds <- nbinomWaldTest(dds) > res <- results(dds, name=3D"groupB.X") > sum(res$padj<=3D0.05, na.rm=3DTRUE) > hist(res$padj) > = > As I found no significant interaction (the minimum adjusted p-value is ab= out 0.6), I decided to remove the interaction term from the design and to u= se ~ group + X. I can then test for the coefficients of X. > = > If I do not detect any significant interaction, I think it is due to a la= ck of power. So, can I use the additive model ~ group + X even if it will n= ot be correct for genes which actually have an interaction? > = > Many thanks in advance, > = > Hugo > = > PS: I am using R 3.1.1 and DESeq2 1.4.5 > = > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > [email protected] > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informat= ics.conductor _______________________________________________ Bioconductor mailing list [email protected] https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatic= s.conductor