Re: Re: [Bioclusters] RDBMS and Bioinformatics

"Glenn T. Colby" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.biology.informatics.devel
Message-ID <Pine.WNT.4.58.0403151440510.2400@buddy>
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Hong Zhang wrote:

> Most people may not choose ORACLE due to its price.

I concur, but many people do not realize that Oracle comes in several
editions -- Many features of the Enterprise Edition (very expensive) may
not be necessary for your application.  In our case, the Standard Edition
has met our needs well for a fraction of the cost.  If you intend to put
up a very large publicly-available database that requires
parallel-processing, hot-backups, etc., then sure, you would need
Enterprise edition.  I would be interested in hearing what others have to
say about the Standard vs. Enterprise Edition issue.

I used Sybase before (for the Mouse Genome Database) and found it performs
well, but nothing can match Oracle's proprietary PL/SQL language.  If you
intend to write a lot of code at the DB level (stored procs, triggers,
etc.), then Oracle is the way to go, IMHO.  If you are going to write your
business logic at a higher level, then Sybase may meet your needs for a
lower cost.

Sybase *does* offer *huge* discounts to non-profits, which I believe is
why many of the publicly-available biological databases started using it
back in the 90s.  If they had it to do over again, I suspect they would
bite the bullet and go for Oracle.

I was also told that the newest release of Oracle (10g) has built-in BLAST
support of some type.  We will see how that turns out...

--Glenn

       ,----------------.   ,-------.   ,--------.   ,-----------.
      /  Glenn T. Colby  \ /  Zappa  \ /  Brahms  \ /  Ellington  \
,----'                    `----------------------------------------.
| [email protected]                   MDI Biological Laboratory     |
|   Information Systems Specialist   Department of Bioinformatics  |
|   tel: (207) 288 9880 x110         Salsbury Cove, ME  04672  USA |

>
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Dr. Hari Koduvely wrote:
>
> > Hi, I would like to know if RDBMS (Relational Data
> > Base Management Systems) is extensively used in
> > Bioinformatics Data Bases. If it indeed true, what is
> > the most suited RDBMS, Oracle?
> >
> > Regards
> > -Hari
> >
> > =====
> > Dr. Hari Koduvely, Ph.D.
> > Research Scientist
> > Unilever Research India
> > 64 Main Road, Whitefield
> > Bangalore 560066, INDIA
> > Ph:+91 80 5139 5629 (Office)
> >      +91 80 5221790 (Res)
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioclusters maillist  -  [email protected]
> > https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters
> >
>
> --
> Hong Zhang, MIS
> Bioinformatics Analyst
> Dana Farber Cancer Institute
> Harvard Medical School
> 44 Binney St, D1510A
> Boston MA 02115
> Email: [email protected]
> Phone: 617-632-3824
> Fax: 617-632-3351
>
> _______________________________________________
> Biodevelopers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/biodevelopers
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.