Re: RDBMS and Bioinformatics

Dan Bolser <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.biology.informatics.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Malay wrote:

> 
> > I think some types of data are better represented by XML.  For example,
> > hierarchical data.  Also, document-oriented data is better stored as XML.
> > For example, a scientific article that has been marked up with useful
> > information.  Storing and indexing something like "<Author>John
> > Doe</Author> used a <ScientificTechnique>microarray</ScientificTechnique>
> > to do blah" would be very complicated in a relational database.
> > 
> 
> XML is very good for anydata that will be parsed using software. That's 
> why is is most of the time an intermediate format. But XML can't be or 
> should not be used anything but very simplistic obeject modellling for 
> relational databases.

I heard about UML for such things. I don't know much about object
modeling, but I have also read it isn't incompatible with RDB. I guess I
should find out more about object databases (don't these run on XML?).

Also I guess I should learn more about XML schema.

Thanks,
Dan.


> 
> Malay
> _______________________________________________
> Biodevelopers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/biodevelopers
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.