Re: RDBMS and Bioinformatics

Dan Bolser <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.biology.informatics.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Joe Landman wrote:

> On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 04:46, Dan Bolser wrote:
> 
> > > > But what is the point in creating biological data in this form, when the
> > > > 'data model' is basically our own concept about the data?
> > > 
> > > One of these days someone is going to extend Go"del's incompleteness
> > > proof for biological systems. 
> > 
> > 
> > I wish someone would tell the physicists about it :) every time I see a
> > show about GUT I think Godel must be hopping mad!
> 
> :)  Careful, you might be speaking to one right now, and not even know
> it.

But are GUT's impossible according to Godel? That working on a GUT is a
waste of time or not is a different question. I take your point that the
activity alone can be very usefull without hope of sucess (like the search
for the philosophers stone).

 
> 
> Of course, we have wandered OT here. 

;) sci.physics.research ?

 
> > > > Wouldn't a SwissProt RDB be much more sensible than an XML document?
> > > 
> > > Only if the Swissprot never changes format.  The whole point of XML is
> > > the "X".  Extensible.  If you want to integrate portions of Swissprot
> > > into your own research DB, you can do this, but you would either have to
> > > deal with the Swissprot normalization model, or datamart the swissprot
> > > and create your own normalization .
> > 
> > 
> > Sure, but you have to understand the structure of the XML document just as
> > much as you would need to understand the data model of the RDB. Data
> > models do change, and you have to change code. Are you saying that
> > changing the structure of XML has less impact on the whole system? I guess
> > this is *the* reason people talk about XML.
> 
> Basically.  Once you have a parser for XML, it should (if it is working
> properly) parse *any* XML.  So your structure can change, or your
> information can change without altering your code for the most part.

Well, I will take your word for it! 

Cheers,
Dan.


> 
> Joe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Biodevelopers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/biodevelopers
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.