Re: BLAST asymmetrical
"Michael Nuhn" <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:07:07 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.biology.informatics.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <024201c73ba9$324409a0$80baf683@nbc1> |
Hi, Ela! >BLAST is a heuristic, so it is not just asymmetrical, I am still wondering: which part of the algorithm makes blast asymmetrical? >but can miss hits of interest, if you are not lucky. This virtually never happens. It is more a question of thresholds used, which, I admit, is a topic that can lead to lengthy discussions. I have compared Nucmer and Blast alignments for aligning contigs to a reference genome and found that Blast produced better results (for us) because it is more sensitive. (Which is not really a surprise.) >You could use MUMmer to align two genomes. >http://mummer.sourceforge.net/. Mummer is a great program to get an overall overview of rearrangements in a pair of genomes. I am interested in where genome A and genome B have homologies and where they don't. The Mummer alignment algorithm discards hits in the stage where it constructs the longest increasing subsequence. http://mummer.sourceforge.net/MUMmer.pdf (Section: Sorting the MUMs, Figure 3) I want all homologies. >Or even Smith-Waterman which will take a while to run. Do you know of a program that can calculate SW on a pair of genomes? Greetings from Germany, Michael.