Re: More comments on 'the dispute'...
John K Pettifer <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:10:35 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.cryptography.bletchley-park |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2F20600B7D4349A6B8289FB4C75E8AD9@STORM> |
If any of the BP Trustees do see this list it would be really helpful if they could tell the public whether or not they believe that Colossus & Tunny should, at least in principle, be an integral part of the BP story. The TMNOC statement makes clear that it does, but as it stands the BP Trust statement is completely silent on this aspect. If the Trustees do agree with the TMNOC in principle, hopefully with goodwill a workable compromise might be achieved. If the Trustees do not agree, it may be pertinent to mention that their charitable "objects" (as set out in their governing Memorandum of Understanding) make specific mention of the "history of computers". In addition, the Trust's statement of "activities" on the Charity Commission's website gives prominence to the "birth of computers". John Pettifer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Ridgeway" <[email protected]> To: <BLETCHLEYPARK-0lvw86wZMd/[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 1:25 PM Subject: Re: [BPARK] More comments on 'the dispute'... > Do we know if emails to this List go to any of the Trustees? > > Regards. > > Bill Ridgeway > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3681/7041 - Release Date: > 01/28/14