Re: M4 Steckers
Geoff Sullivan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.cryptography.bletchley-park |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
philmarks-L+Gohi/[email protected] wrote: > Tony Sale wrote: > > > All, In thinking about the M4 "find the Steckers" problem I decided to > > do what BP would have done, look for human errors in the preparation > > of setting sheets, and I found them. > > In a 1944 months setting sheet, the person preparing it had obviously > > got tired of doing them. On any one day there are sequences, sometimes > > four long of incremented letters such as, AL BM CN DO. > > I suggest that in working through letter pairs, at least two and > > possibly three successive letter increments are tried at the same time. > > I don't have any more examples, but it is clear that Bletchley Park was > looking out for this kind of thing throughout the war. > > There is a wartime memo in the US National Archives showing that in late > 1944 BP detected examples of Umkehrwalze D pairings from one Luftwaffe key > having been used to construct the Stecker pairings for another. This memo > was written by the same Reg Parker mentioned by Gordon Welchman in "The Hut > 6 Story" as having detected repeated portions of Enigma keys back in 1942. > > I'm not aware of any similar examples from German Naval traffic, and in > general the Luftwaffe was much less conscious of cipher security than its > marine counterpart. > > Tony's example is rather more egregious. I believe there were instances > where local Luftwaffe offices made up their own keys rather than receiving > them from a central cipher office, and in those cases it seems more likely > that poor practices could be adopted. Presumably all of these organizations > were getting pretty short on staff by that stage of the war, while the > demand for key sheets was increasing as the Luftwaffe (and for that matter > the German Navy) started to segregate their networks into more and more > separate keys. Tony, we found some bad Stecker pairs in 1941 (for example connections like A/X, B/Y, C/X, D/W). Certain other pairs were favoured. The 1945 messages seemed to be more random. So these two networks had different practices. If you are lucky enough to guess 3 Stecker, you may see little plaintext in the decrypt (about 1 in 5 letters correct on average). Finding the first few is difficult. Geoff