Re: [dinosaur] Was T. rex a lion or rather a crocodile?
Dann Pigdon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.dinosaurs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Aug 11th, 2019 at 10:54 PM, Thomas Richard Holtz <[email protected]> wrote: > Please remember: Tyrannosaurus rex (and indeed most dinosaurs) did not > exist only as fully formed adults emerged from the mind of Zeus. They spent > most of their life cycle as juveniles and sub-adults. Given the high mortality rate associated with R-strategists, it's likely the "average" tyrannosaur wasn't very large at all (possibly not much larger than a hatchling). Very large tyrannosaurs are likely to be over- represented in the fossil record due to preservational bias. Tyrannosaurs seem to have reached sexual maturity well before reaching their maximum size, so having few very large individuals in a population likely wouldn't have had much of an impact on their reproductive success. Too many very large geriatric animals may well have been a burden on the population rather than an advantage. As to whether T.rex was leonine or crocodilian in nature; that depends on what you mean by 'crocodilian'. In the past there have been plenty of swift and agile terrestrial crocodilians that make our extant varieties look positively sluggish. -- Dann Pigdon