Re: [dinosaur] New preprint: sauropods have spinal-cord supports like salamanders

Mike Taylor <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.dinosaurs.general
Message-ID <CACnMvBbYhYA78vUCUTWBpjSW_8t+5d3Fhh1+8B5_jOTo3iO+7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Yes, I lament the forthcoming closing of PeerJ Preprints, and I'm a bit
lost as to why it's happening and why Peter and Jason aren't being as
forthcoming and communicative over this as they usually are. As it happens,
I plan to post a PeerJ Preprint this very evening — from my SVPCA talk that
is the counterpart of the Atherholt and Wedel one that launched this thread
— but it will likely be my last. I like PeerJ Preprints partly just because
I'm used to it, no doubt. But it does also have a bunch of neat features,
including collections, comments and questions. I guess I will find out soon
enough whether BiorXiv has them, too.

-- Mike.


On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 16:37, Jura <[email protected]> wrote:

> PeerJ Preprints is going to be closed, BTW. Nobody has so much as hinted
> at a reason; the official statement on PeerJ's blog just claims "the time
> has come", there's no way to leave comments on that post, and when I wrote
> an e-mail to ask, I didn't get any reaction.
>
> =============================
>
> I suspect it's because it was never all that popular. Despite the strong
> push from folks like the SVPOW guys, according to a Facebook convo on Nick
> Gardner's wall, PeerJ preprints were always a hard sell for prospective
> submitters. They might try funneling things towards BioRxiv or PaleorXiv in
> the future, especially now that there is a glut of options available to
> people wanting to go that route.
>
> Jason
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.