Re: [dinosaur] Submerged sauropods
Gregory Paul <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.dinosaurs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In whales the lungs are set up up under the roof of the ribcage for reasons that are obvious, and are about 2 m below water level with the back at the surface. From what I know whales exhale while the lungs are still fairly deep and water pressure does the work, and inhale when horizontal to minimize the muscle work. -----Original Message----- From: Mike Taylor <[email protected]> To: Dann Pigdon <[email protected]> Cc: dinosaur-l <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Oct 10, 2019 5:57 pm Subject: Re: [dinosaur] Submerged sauropods They would likely not have been able to inspire when their lungs were more than a meter below the surface of the water — at least, that's the conclusion from Kermack. (I wonder how far below the surface the lungs of big whales are.) -- Mike. On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 22:49, Dann Pigdon <[email protected]> wrote: On Thu, Oct 10th, 2019 at 11:22 PM, Mike Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > Kermack's reasoning is rock-solid, and there is essentially no possibility > of snorkelling sauropods. As Kermack himself noted in the closing words of > his paper, "If the sauropods were, in fact, aquatic, they probably lived > much the same sort of life as the present-day Hippopotamus, swimming and > diving in the water, and walking along the bottom. To breathe, however, > they would have needed to raise their body nearly, if not quite, to the > surface." > > -- Mike. It makes you wonder how elasmosaurids or tanystropheids managed to breathe. Would they have needed to surface completely with their bodies held horizontal? -- Dann Pigdon