Re: [dinosaur] Diadectomorphs and seymouriamorphs as amniotes from inner ear morphology

"David Marjanovic" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.dinosaurs.general
Message-ID <trinity-5ca2e119-0cad-4580-a8ae-7b68814babd5-1570822336326@3c-app-gmx-bs30>
> Disagree. The standard usage of "stem-" in invertebrate paleo refers to members outside the crown group but closer to it than to the next closest crown group (so stem-arthropod, stem-mollusk, etc.). But "non-crown amniotes" is (as noted) a nonsensical term.

But "members of a taxon, but not of its crown-group" is exactly what "stem-group" has meant ever since Hennig. I don't think I've seen phylogenetic definitions for Arthropoda or Mollusca, and Arthropoda at least is usually treated as having an apomorphy-based definition (it's not clear if even the trilobites are crown-group arthropods, but they're not going to be kicked out of Arthropoda!), so there are non-crown arthropods = stem-arthropods.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.