Re: [dinosaur] Tanystropheus (Archosauromorpha) revised; Sclerostropheus, new genus (free pdf)
"David Marjanovic" <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:59:45 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.dinosaurs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <trinity-1fd0ede7-023a-468f-9937-7b3f977b3c92-1576688385723@3c-app-gmx-bs77> |
> Type species *T=2E conspicuus* is made a nomen dubium but genus name *Tan= ystropheus* is considered valid=2E=2E=2E Hmmm=2E=2E=2E=2E=C2=A0 > >=C2=A0"Nevertheless it remains the type species as the first named specie= s of the genus, and it is diagnostic on the genus level based on the charac= teristic cervical vertebrae of the type material that are unique to the gen= us *Tanystropheus*=2E" Further quotes: "The size and shape of the vertebral centra, neural spines, and zygapophys= es that can be observed for the large morphotype of *T=2E longobardicus* ar= e indistinguishable from *T=2E conspicuus* and *T=2E haasi*=2E Additionally= , other isolated material assigned to *T=2E conspicuus*, comprising dorsal,= sacral, and caudal vertebrae, as well as a humerus and femora, also cannot= be distinguished from this taxon (Wild, 1973; personal observation SNFS)= =2E However, because only a very limited comparison is possible, and skull = material, which is likely more diagnostic, is completely lacking for both t= axa, an unambiguous taxonomic identification of *T=2E conspicuus* and *T=2E= haasi* is not possible=2E Therefore we propose to consider both taxa as no= mina dubia=2E" "*Tanystropheus conspicuus* is considered to be represented by insufficien= t material to distinguish it convincingly from other *Tanystropheus* taxa, = and we therefore consider it a nomen dubium=2E Nevertheless" (continued abo= ve) So, the normal thing to do would be to sink *T=2E longobardicus* and *T=2E= haasi* into *T=2E conspicuus*, because all three are indistinguishable fro= m another=2E But because the material of *T=2E conspicuus* and *T=2E haasi*= is so limited that hardly anything can be compared, the authors prefer to = withhold judgment, and they implement that by calling *T=2E conspicuus* and= *T=2E haasi* nomina dubia and maintaining the name *T=2E longobardicus*=2E None of this turns the genus name into a nomen dubium=2E It is completely = clear that the material called *T=2E conspicuus* and *T=2E haasi* forms an = exclusive clade with the material called *T=2E longobardicus* and *T=2E ant= iquus*, and the available name for this clade is *Tanystropheus*=2E