lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system)

On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Nick Nicholas wrote:

>
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 14:41:56 +0100
> > From: "And Rosta" <[email protected]>
> > Subject: essentials of a gadri system
> >
> > As a contribution to the discussion, I thought I'd sketch
> > what I think the essentials of a gadri system would be. I
> > am ignoring both the current system, and the question of
> > how to express these essentials verbally.
>
> Accepted. For my part, I have put my contribution on wiki, at
> http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/gadri%20report%2C%20aug%202003


In your definitions of intension and extension, where does specificity
enter in? lo mikce is by definition "nonspecific", making it intensional,
yet it's defined as "da poi broda", which by your explanation is the
archetype of extension!



-- 
The Pentagon group believed it had a visionary strategy that would
transform Iraq into an ally of Israel, remove a potential threat to the
Persian Gulf oil trade and encircle Iran with U.S. friends and allies...