Re: No static, democratic (was: essentials of a gadri

Invent Yourself <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Jorge Llambías wrote:

>
> la xod cusku di'e
>
> > > I think you and I agree. We just have different ideas about
> > > which of the two situations is more basic/frequent.
> >
> > Is this my western culture bias? I find it hard to consider constituent
> > individuals as less basic than the groups they can form at times.
>
> That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that it is more common, when
> talking about a group, to talk about properties that the group has
> as a whole than about properties that all the members share. It is
> more basic because it is logically simpler: in one case you are talking
> about a single instance of the relationship, in the other case about as
> many instances of the relationship as there are members.
>
> > > Hopefully we both agree that {le pa broda} and {lei pa broda} are
> > > equivalent ways of refering to an individual, given that a single
> > > individual taken "one at a time" is equivalent to a single individual
> > > taken "together".
> >
> > Except I think the latter form is at best unhelpful and misleading (Grice.
> > Grice.),
>
> But both are Griceanly inadequate to the same extent, in that one insists
> about emergence and the other insists about distributivity when neither
> concept applies.


I think you mean that if I say "the group walks" I have a fudge factor
that can withstand a couple of kids being carried, but if I use the
individual gadri, then each and every person had better be walking, or I'm
a liar.

I would rather encode that fudge factor in the enumeration, if possible,
instead of in the notion of a collective.


>
> > and at worst an interesting koan like zi'o crino -- given that I
> > think loi'a should be used to draw the reader's attention to emergent
> > properties, and no properties emerge from a collective with only one
> > member.
>
> And no property is distributable among one member either.
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes



-- 
The Pentagon group believed it had a visionary strategy that would
transform Iraq into an ally of Israel, remove a potential threat to the
Persian Gulf oil trade and encircle Iran with U.S. friends and allies...
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.