Re: The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system)
Jorge "Llamb?as" <jjllambias2000-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Invent Yourself <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Jorge Llambías wrote: > > If so, isn't the restricted CLL-lo'e a waste of cmavo? A Kind-lo'e could > > include CLL-lo'e and easily and accurately specify its restricted > > application with {na'o} when so required: > > > > lo'e cinfo na'o xabju le friko > > Lions typically live in Africa. > > But this na'o doesn't add the definitionality implied by lo'e'e. Add {ca'e} if you want definitionality, but are you saying that lions live in Africa by definition of "lion"? If all lions in Africa were to become extinct, we would need to redefine the concept of "lion"? mu'o mni'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com