Re: Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system)
John Cowan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
And Rosta scripsit: > > > Prototype-theorists, i.e. some cognitive psychologists, would want to talk > > > about (b), but it needn't be built into the fabric of the language. > > > > Need not be but is. > > Is how? In lo'e? But you and I are in agreement that CLL-lo'e is more > general than Prototype. Exactly. It's le'e that is prototype, or perhaps more precisely my-prototype. -- As you read this, I don't want you to feel John Cowan sorry for me, because, I believe everyone jcowan-k6JZYsoqQQ8PxK1qzZLvrwC/[email protected] will die someday. -- From a Nigerian-type http://www.reutershealth.com scam spam I got http://www.ccil.org/~cowan