Re: LAhE = lo broda be ?

Jorge "Llamb?as" <jjllambias2000-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske
Message-ID <[email protected]>
la and cusku di'e

> xorxes:
> > Can we say that for every LAhE there is some broda that
> > can replace it so that {LAhE ko'a} = {lo broda be ko'a}?
> 
> PA1 LAhE ko'a = PA1 broda be ko'a

Right.

> > lu'i ko'a = lo selcmi be ko'a
[...] 
> > If this is so, then understanding the interaction of LAhEs and
> > quantifiers is relatively easy and there are no additional
> > decisions to make. 
> 
> Right.

But notice that this means {lu'i ko'a} is a set that includes ko'a
but does not necessarily exclude anything else.

If we want the set that has ko'a and only ko'a as a member, we
can't use {selcmi}. If we use a broda that means "x1 has x2 as its 
only member", then we can't use it for {lu'i ko'a e ko'e} to
get {ko'a ce ko'e}...

mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.