Re: Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system)

John:
> And Rosta scripsit:
>
> > I don't see why le'e should be any different from lo'e. In a context
where
> > lo'i jbopre cu du le'i prenu, it will be the case that lo'e jbopre cu du
> > le'e prenu.
>
> Very true, and that means that speaking Lojban is part of your
> stereotype of persons, or that Lojban-speakers are prototype persons.

These'd be "lo'e prenu cu jbopre". "lo'e jbopre cu du le'e prenu" may not
mean what I meant (-- the logic of CLL lV'e is hard to work out), but
"ro bu'a go lo'e jbopre gi le'e prenu" should be safer: "Something is
characteristic of Lojbanists iff it is characteristic of these people".

--And.