Re: Digest Number 217
John Cowan <[email protected]> Fri, 8 Aug 2003 13:29:49 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jorge Llamb��)B�as scripsit:
> It should also be clear that a quantifier for Unique is a fourth
> quantifier, different from those three. It can be argued that
> it is a non-quantifier, because of its properties. Lojban {tu'o}
> is appropriate for this function.
Well, in that case, please argue it and make it clear. So far
I've only seen proof my assertion.
--
Income tax, if I may be pardoned for saying so, John Cowan
is a tax on income. --Lord Macnaghten (1901) [email protected]