torch
Nick Nicholas <[email protected]> Sat, 9 Aug 2003 10:31:34 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I had a huge flame of jboske ready to send last night. I didn't. I send
this now, though.
A Lojban which contains {lo} = Kind is so incommensurable with CLL, and
so manifestly against the entire spirit of the language (which is
founded on Quine and not Montague), that its acceptance will force me
to cut ties with the language. I will not relearn {lo}, and I will not
ask anyone else to; this is where I draw the line.
Jorge started that particular thread by saying it was a revisionist
fantasy, and I need not read it. I wish And had stuck to that. And this
is why I did not want BPFK discussions to happen on jboske as it
stands. I should not even have to entertain consideration of change so
disruptive.
I am supposed to wade through 500 K of this produced over just five
days, with no sign of letup. Frankly, I no longer see the point of any
of this --- or of starting to have my sleep, day job and research start
suffering again for this. And, if you can't see by now that this is the
kind of proposal that *should not be made at all to BFPK*, then go
ahead and make it. But you have my veto.
--
Dr Nick Nicholas, French & Italian, University of Melbourne, Australia.
http://www.opoudjis.net [email protected]
"Most Byzantine historians felt they knew enough to use the optatives
correctly; some of them were right." --- Harry Turtledove.