Re: tense and atemporality
Bob LeChevalier <[email protected]> Sat, 09 Aug 2003 01:41:48 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 02:29 PM 8/8/03 -0700, Jorge "LlambĂas" wrote:
>Consider:
>
>jbena x1 is born to x2 at time x3 [birthday] and place x4 [birthplace];
>
>What does {mi fi li 1966;10;17 ba'o jbena} mean? That the relationship
>between "mi" and "1966;10;17" is no longer occurring?
Not having seen how you got here, so I'm probably putting by foot in my
mouth ...
It means that there was an event of mi being born at that time, and it is
the aftermath of that event. So yes, the event of your being born (which
presumably happened at that time) is no longer occurring.
mi ba'o klama le zarci similarly means that we are in the aftermath of my
going to the store.
I'm not sure how I see that there should be a difference, merely because
one of the places is a time.
lojbab
--
lojbab [email protected]
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org