Re: torch
Bob LeChevalier <[email protected]> Sat, 09 Aug 2003 13:02:20 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 09:23 AM 8/9/03 -0700, Jorge "LlambĂas" wrote: >3- Statements like "its acceptance will force me to cut ties >with the language" are not conductive to consensus. There are some level of changes that would lead conservatives to abandon the language. Yes it interferes with consensus. Therefore, we either choose not to make the change, or if newbies would leave under that decision, we decide who will be driven away. There ARE some lines in the sand. People need to realize that. If there are too many, then consensus is impossible, but I don't think that there are too many. lojbab -- lojbab [email protected] Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group (Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.) Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org