Re: Quine vs Montague, the deathmatch

la xod cusku di'e

> > http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/XS%20gadri%20proposal
>
> Now, what about lo'e itself? I don't see why we need a
> separate gadri for definitions, when they are handled with ro or ka'u ro.
> And in any case they are notoriously tricky; it's not a definitional trait
> of the lion that it is seen by me, etc. Yet most people interpret the
> CLL's treatment as na'o.

lo'e/le'e/lo'i/le'i/loi/lei are ignored by this proposal: they are not
needed, as everything is covered by lo and le. The rest can remain as
close to the traditional definitions as desired, or they can be given
somewhat more useful functions in some cases, but we should keep all
that separate so as not to confuse the proposal.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com