Re: Re: Dr. Rosta's comments on my gadri whitepaper
Jorge "Llamb?as" <jjllambias2000-/[email protected]> Fri, 15 Aug 2003 14:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
la mark cusku di'e
> These two definitions are not consistent with one another. By the
> second one, (in which {ci lo re plise} means "three pairs of apples"),
> {ro le ci broda} would mean "all the triples of brodas" (assuming that
> lo and le quantify the same way, which I'll grant is not a given).
No, quantifiers on {lo} quantify over avatars of the Kind, quantifiers
on {le} quantify over members of the Specific.
> don't know that xorxes' XS and And's are definitely intended to be in
> perfect agreement, but it looks like they aren't here.
They are intended to be the same thing, yes. If they aren't, it is
probably unintentional.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com