Re: extending XS to other gadri

And Rosta scripsit:

> (ii) Let (tu'o)lVi mean "Mr Xod-collective of", where a xod-collective is a
> kind of group that shares none of its properties with its constituents;

So a small group of large objects and a large group of small objects are
xod-collectives, but not a s.g. of s.o. or a l.g. of l.o.? Of what
utility is such a notion?

Or do you mean that it *essentially* (i.e. non-accidentally) shares none
of its properties? If so, how is it distinct from a mathematical set?

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan-k6JZYsoqQQ8PxK1qzZLvrwC/[email protected]> http://www.reutershealth.com
"But no living man am I! You look upon a woman. Eowyn I am, Eomund's daughter.
You stand between me and my lord and kin. Begone, if you be not deathless.
For living or dark undead, I will smite you if you touch him."