[WikiDiscuss] Re: BPFK gismu Section: Parenthetical Remarks in Brivla Definition
"John E. Clifford" <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:09:50 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- In [email protected], "Jorge Llamb=EDas" <jjllambias@...> wrote: > > On 9/25/06, John E. Clifford <clifford-j@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Jorge Llamb=EDas" <jjllambias@> wrote: > > > > > > Yes. For definiteness, let's consider a simple model: > > > > > > The universe of discourse is a set with three elements: > > > U=3D{John, unicorns, elephants}. > > > > I assume you mean "unicorn" and "elephant", otherwise there would be > > more than three things in the universe. >=20 > Well, English is not the ideal metalanguage for Lojban, because of its > obligatory number marking. But the sentence "There are three things > in the domain of discourse: namely unicorns, elephants and John" is > perfectly normal English, as far as I understand. The English plural form > is not infrequently used with a single referent. Maybe if we could use > Chinese (or even Lojban) as our metalanguage this issue wouldn't even > arise. Unfortunately, I don't speak any Chinese. Me neither. I would take "unicorns" as one thing to be part of a joke (as here) or as some sort of dialect form (and that usually as part of a joke).=20=20 > > You seem to be serious with this rather bad joke, so please explain > > how "unicorns" can be singular other than as a typo. I agree that if > > someone says {lo pavyseljirna} in a primary place, I take it that > > there is at least one unicorn in his universe and adjust the universe > > I am constructing accordingly (or get him to readjust his). But this > > does not say anything about the critters John wants: in your mini > > universe, John could want a hippopotamus or a centaur without changing > > anything. >=20 > John could want those things in addition to wanting unicorns, but if he doesn't > want unicorns, then the model constructed in the discourse, which includes > {la djan cu djica lo pavyseljirna} as one of its true sentences, would not be a > very good model (even if internally self-consistent). I wasn't saing that he does not want unicorns, only that he can want things other than unicorns, things that do not appear in the universe.So, indeed, he could want unicorns in a model which contained only John and a bunch of elephants. (He could alsosay truthfully in this smaller model that unicorns do not exist -- indeed that there are no unicorns.) =20 Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jboske/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jboske/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[email protected]=20 mailto:[email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ =20