Re: [engelang] Engelang or Jboske?

John Cowan <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:40:55 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske
Message-ID <[email protected]>
And Rosta scripsit:

> Can I propose Engelang, then, as the locus of discussion? That is, I hereby
> propose Engelang as the locus of discussion.

By all means.  But I understood the proposal to be to consolidate Engelang
and Jboske into a single mailing list, since both are extremely low
traffic (54 Engelang and 70 Jboske messages since the beginning of 2011).

Jboske is at the moment the larger group (60 members vs. 35), but Engelang
has the wider scope (engineered languages, explicitly including Loglan
and Lojban), so I think transferring the members of Jboske to Engelang
would be the best course of action, and then blocking further posts and
members of Jboske, while of course leaving the public archives intact.

-- 
How comes city and country to be filled with drones         John Cowan
and rogues, our highways with hackers, and all          [email protected]
places with sloth and wickedness?           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
                --W. Blith, Eng. Improver Improved, 1652


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jboske/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jboske/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/