How to write about things that were once notable?
David Gerard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.english |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJ0tu1G+CHizEB7hFxUq1oH-bk-UxFyKrkqxjQPzZEqDpsJ7rA@mail.gmail.com> |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Citizendium#So_what_and_how_do_we_write_about_this_sort_of_thing.3F How to write about things like [[Citizendium]], [[Conservapedia]], [[Veropedia]] - things that were notable at the time and got lots of press coverage and hence articles, and which readers may well want to read about into the future - but which have fallen out of notice and so their decline (and, in the case of Veropedia, death) got no coverage and hence we can't answer the reader question "so, whatever did happen to X?" (Anyone who wants to reply saying "Citizendium is alive and well and will rise again!" or similar needs to check the most recent WP:RS-suitable coverage from 2011: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/10/five-year-old-wikipedia-fork-is-dead-in-the-water/ and particularly the comments, where people have never heard of this thing and in two weeks no-one even defends the project.) - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l