Re: Gallery policy

Steve Bennett <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.english
Message-ID <CA+z=q=vQSaGDtJiUqMch6GOx87ixvongo2FY2QWVTKJZtXAyaQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:49 PM, geni <[email protected]> wrote:
> However the overall format in the article is considered when
> considering what is appropriate. Image galleries create large breaks
> in the text and messy formatting due to issues with screen resolution.
> As a result there are best limited to where there is a solid need for
> such things. The other problem with image galleries is that they are
> often use to keep poor quality images in the article. Certainly when
> I've expanded articles with image galleries I've often killed of the
> images in the galleries entirely rather than using them in the article
> proper.

Good points - although it's annoying that the weakness of our layout
engine affects the content we can display.


>> 2) The Commons links are incredibly obscure, and I don't think the
>> average punter ever sees or visits them. It's like telling someone to
>> ring the hotline for more information - they just don't. The link
>> doesn't give any indication whether there are 2 images on Commons on
>> 200.
>
> Not relevant.

We're not serving our readers well by putting images behind a link
that they won't see or use.

>> 3) Galleries let you illustrate a much wider range of the subject
>> matter than by simply placing images in the margins. For example, in
>> the contentious [[Lamington National Park]], we could illustrate all
>> the waterfalls, most of the important flora, fauna, and geological
>> features.
>
> We could but if they were that important it should be possible to
> include enough text for the image to sit next to the. We also have
> extensive articles on flora, fauna, and geological features that
> people can go and look at if they want images of those things.

Indeed - it *is* possible to include enough text. Should the current
absence of such text preclude images? (A genuine question: is it ok
for an article to be unbalanced in the short term?)

> You can try but you are unlikely to get very far.

Yeah, figured.

Steve

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.