Re: Psychological correlates of deletionism/inclusionism?

David Gerard <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.english
Message-ID <CAJ0tu1Gvk+_rYYQLeNW4Gs8HWsBVXxAP=ePsxdQ-Bg1ft1o6Ow@mail.gmail.com>
On 13 April 2013 23:42, Carcharoth <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4/13/13, Gwern Branwen <[email protected]> wrote:

>> My basic observation here is that inclusionism/deletionism debates
>> seem intractable, like religion and politics, which have long been
>> correlated with a variety of mental and neurological observations and
>> this deep-seated roots of those beliefs seems to explain why politics
>> is so wasteful and damaging; hence the obvious question becomes, is
>> inclusionism/deletionism another such case?

> I think there is actually a sensible middle ground, which gets lost
> because those with more extreme views are more vocal. That is similar
> to politics in a way. And why would you think that
> inclusionism/deletionism debates are intractable? I thought the idea
> that such terms should be avoided (as they are divisive) was taking
> hold and gaining ground?


I'm broadly an inclusionist, but by crikey there's a lot of utter,
utter shit on the wiki. I've been nominating hopeless shite lately,
for AFD or even just PROD. Not much, you understand. I can give it up
any time.


- d.

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.