Re: serious fallacies
Charles Matthews <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:28:02 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.english |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEgLstQsYUoKD89=EigMMV2DaLF4d-bjbQWXXyb6OgHTb7AXQw@mail.gmail.com> |
On 16 April 2013 14:20, Kathleen McCook <[email protected]> wrote > I agree with you, Charles. These fallacies are quite transparent. And it is > too bad that much good effort and input to the Wikipedia initiative can be > lost due to those who feel it is their to be "forthright" (wiggle word) > rather than helpful. There is nothing wrong with being helpful. There > is everything wrong with a nasty officious edge. To be clear, I don't engage in these debates to diminish the community. I come in as a "policy wonk" if I feel the policy involved is being misread, too close to the letter. That's not the trouble here. Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l