Re: The Baader-Meinhof phenomenon is now well-known because it's been on Wikipedia for so long

David Gerard <[email protected]> Sat, 8 Mar 2014 09:25:17 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.english
Message-ID <CAJ0tu1FNsCj-W0DhSQrQUyP6qmxm0L9-FTrXD2Fi5zaOaGCjyg@mail.gmail.com>
On 8 March 2014 09:20, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5 March 2014 22:04, Brian J Mingus <[email protected]> wrote:

>> The article should reinstated, a section concerning the unique nature of
>> its notability should be added.

> This argument doesn't seem to convince (though that does resemble
> reasonable popularity). The fourth AFD notes the problem in this case:
> really crappy sources. The sort of thing that would lead me to !vote
> "delete without prejudice".


linkto:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baader-Meinhof_phenomenon in Google shows
that it hits Reddit and apparently 4chan a bit. Apparently StumbleUpon
likes it too. This would account for the hit rates - it's an amusing
thing people would like there to be a name for, c.f. "The Meaning Of
Liff" - but still doesn't supply us with sufficient material to base a
solid article on.


- d.

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l