Re: The Baader-Meinhof phenomenon is now well-known because it's been on Wikipedia for so long
David Gerard <[email protected]> Sat, 8 Mar 2014 09:25:17 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.english |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJ0tu1FNsCj-W0DhSQrQUyP6qmxm0L9-FTrXD2Fi5zaOaGCjyg@mail.gmail.com> |
On 8 March 2014 09:20, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 March 2014 22:04, Brian J Mingus <[email protected]> wrote: >> The article should reinstated, a section concerning the unique nature of >> its notability should be added. > This argument doesn't seem to convince (though that does resemble > reasonable popularity). The fourth AFD notes the problem in this case: > really crappy sources. The sort of thing that would lead me to !vote > "delete without prejudice". linkto:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baader-Meinhof_phenomenon in Google shows that it hits Reddit and apparently 4chan a bit. Apparently StumbleUpon likes it too. This would account for the hit rates - it's an amusing thing people would like there to be a name for, c.f. "The Meaning Of Liff" - but still doesn't supply us with sufficient material to base a solid article on. - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l