Re: On Dialects.
Stevertigo <utilitymuffinresearch2-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.international |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- "Vladimir V. Medeiko (Dr Bug)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > For the short run, resources of contributors are > divided between several > dialects and so none of them has enough resources, > and some of them even > don't have "critical mass" that allows them to > evolve. > > On the other hand, for the long run, dialects > represent slightly different > views on the sensitive issues, and this means two > things - first, articles > in both dialects improve their quality through > convergence instead of edit > wars, and second, one who comprehends one dialect, > most probably comprehends > another one too and so is able to read additional > information of the same > topic. This sounds almost like a Fred Bauder argument-- which led to internet-encyclopedia.org (which has a nice logo by the way) ~S~ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com