Re: Per-page statistics
Ray Saintonge <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Dec 2003 14:59:36 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.international |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ramanan Selvaratnam wrote: >On Wed, 2003-12-24 at 14:43, Roozbeh Pournader wrote: > >>b) Sometimes a single German word contains information equivalent to >>three English words. Putting them next to each other will suggest people >>to compare them, which is just idiotic. >> >In the case of Tamil this is a very good analogy except joining words >are governed by some grammatical rules which seems to be getting >extinct. > >The concept of full stop itself was introduced only around mid 19th >century by the person who helped to translate the Bible for a >missionary. > >So sometimes the word count for the same article after an edit in the >wiki might differ but not the substance. > One should deal with the question in the spirit in which it was asked. It was trying to find a measure for the relative completeness of the versions of an article in two different languages. For reasons that have been raised using words as the basis for such a measure would simply not work. We can, however, measure the relative sizes of two text files. We can also develop a statistical measure to compare the sizes of two texts. The Rosetta Project uses the first 3 chapters of the Bible's book of Genesis as a standard, and provides version in more than 1,000 languages. A bare text in any of these languages will have a certain length. Comparing that with the text in another language can give us a factor that we can then apply to one of our text to give a statistical estimate of how long a translated text should be in another language. Ec