Red links on steroids

Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.misc
Message-ID <CAO53wxWsqWRrAU+TzwBt5=bhaixdDnD3X326k_4h-jCU8hKiMA@mail.gmail.com>
Hoi,

Red links are part of the MediaWiki architecture. They indicate that a
subject has not been covered in an article. Consequently, they are
functional and, a good thing to have.

When you link to a "disambiguation page", there is a chance that there is a
reference to the missing subject, there is however no guarantee. When you
are looking for a given subject, chances are that Wikidata does have an
item for the missing article.

Magnus Manske created a new template on the en.wp named "Redwd" [1]. It
does do two things, it leaves the red link red and, it refers to both
Wikidata and the Reasonator. I blogged about it [2] and Jane used it on a
disambiguation page [3].

The template is relatively simple and it can easily be copied to any other
Wikipedia that is interested in this functionality. As it is the first
iteration of this functionality, I am sure that there will be people who
will provide us with improvements to what is already on offer.

I want to thank Magnus for the code and Multichill for the documentation.
Thanks,
      GerardM

PS, the disambiguation by Reasonator will show all items that fit a
criterium [4]



[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Redwd
[2]
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2014/03/mark-davis-wrote-shama-lama-ding-dong.html
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koekkoek
[4] http://tools.wmflabs.org/reasonator/?find=Koekkoek
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.