Re: Bem cavalgar: WIP into pt.source

Well, I believe they are true diacritics, but I am no expert on ancient
portuguese. You might find some information on:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reforms_of_Portuguese_orthography although it
seems to be more centered at the reforms during the 20th century.

2010/2/1 Alex Brollo <[email protected]>

>
>
> 2010/2/1 GoEthe.wiki <[email protected]>
>
>> Hi Alex.
>>
>> What kind of suggestions/comments are you looking for? I notice that your
>> OCR text has some difficulties with the ancient portuguese diacritics, but I
>> have no idea how to fix that.
>>
>> Best of luck!
>>
>> Thanks for suggestion. I just rendered an ancient Italian work, and I
> found the same "diacritics" that really are "tituli", t.i. Middle Age common
> abbreviations. But... are they *all* tituli or are some of them real
> diacritics?
>
> My shortcut has been, to consider all "tituli", implying that - as normally
> works in paleography - they can be solved converting them into a n or a m
> following the vocal with them; but... how many mistake I did? No matter, I
> know that there's no one wiki user that can do the "perfect work", someone
> will fix my mistakes... I only hope that they are not too many. :-(
>
> Well, I'll post the question into pt.wikipedia, as you suggested; thanks
> again.
>
> Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiPT mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipt
>
>

_______________________________________________
WikiPT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipt