Re: Serving webfont via Toolforge by default

Brian Wolff <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical
Message-ID <CA+oo+DUPrVg9cE3nV-WyW2RoM=9-5NasaZou=8pXFSzuN1m7aw@mail.gmail.com>
I'd really hope an alternative could be found here. Either let a new font
into ULS or allow the webfont to be uploaded to the local wiki as a file on
a one-off basis.

I personally think loading anything by default from toolforge is really bad
policy. (To be clear, im just a rando, this is just my personal opinion)

On Sunday, 2 November 2025, diskdance via Wikitech-l <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> The Chinese Wikipedia is holding a discussion [1][2] about wiping out
> tofus when displaying rare Chinese characters. During the discussion, one
> option turned out to be serving a webfont covering all CJK planes, which
> was the practice on Chinese Wikipedia more than a decade ago before it was
> disabled for security reasons. Since the reasons are still valid and ULS is
> no longer accepting new font additions, so the only feasible way to achieve
> this is to serve the webfont via a Toolforge domain.
>
> Due to potential impacts of this proposal, I'm writing to ask:
>
>    1. Is it acceptable to serve a webfont (conditionally or not
>    conditionally) via Toolforge by default, policy-wise?
>    2. And is it acceptable in terms of performance (since Toolforge is
>    not using Wikimedia's CDN)?
>
>
> [1] https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:%E4%BA%92%E5%
> 8A%A9%E5%AE%A2%E6%A0%88/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF#%E7%94%9F%E5%
> 83%BB%E5%AD%97webfont
> [2] https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:%E4%BA%92%E5%
> 8A%A9%E5%AE%A2%E6%A0%88/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF#%E4%BB%8B%E7%
> BB%8D%EF%BC%9AWebFont-ZH%E6%9C%8D%E5%8A%A1%E5%8F%8A%E5%B0%
> 8F%E5%B7%A5%E5%85%B7
>
> Best regards,
> diskdance
>

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikitech-l.lists.wikimedia.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.