Re: How to use `deep inference'?

Ozan Kahrmanogullari <ozan-jNDFPZUTrfTw9Zu3TmXbXSJk02hg1TJes0AfqQuZ5sE@public.gmane.org>
Newsgroups gmane.science.mathematics.frogs
Message-ID <Pine.GSO.4.58.0404201601050.12521@gkws0.informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Hi,

> 1) I'm happy with using CoS as formalism and deep inference as a
> property (of a bunch of formalisms) as I just did. I'd just emphasise
> "deep inference" rather than "CoS" as the main idea that's behind the
> good properties we get.

I agree that it is a good thing to be able to distinguish the CoS from
the later formalisms which are based on deep inference. I have an
ego-centric reason for this, namely, that there is a straight forward
correspondence between CoS systems and term rewriting systems. As far as
I understood this correspondence is not explicit in general "deep inference".

The correspondence with term rewriting is important from the view of
implementations of CoS systems, to which I recently dedicated a web site:

http://www.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/~ozan/maude_cos.html

I will be happy to have any comments on improvements.

Cheers.
-Ozan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.