Re: How to use `deep inference'?
Ozan Kahrmanogullari <ozan-jNDFPZUTrfTw9Zu3TmXbXSJk02hg1TJes0AfqQuZ5sE@public.gmane.org>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.mathematics.frogs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.GSO.4.58.0404201601050.12521@gkws0.informatik.uni-leipzig.de> |
Hi, > 1) I'm happy with using CoS as formalism and deep inference as a > property (of a bunch of formalisms) as I just did. I'd just emphasise > "deep inference" rather than "CoS" as the main idea that's behind the > good properties we get. I agree that it is a good thing to be able to distinguish the CoS from the later formalisms which are based on deep inference. I have an ego-centric reason for this, namely, that there is a straight forward correspondence between CoS systems and term rewriting systems. As far as I understood this correspondence is not explicit in general "deep inference". The correspondence with term rewriting is important from the view of implementations of CoS systems, to which I recently dedicated a web site: http://www.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/~ozan/maude_cos.html I will be happy to have any comments on improvements. Cheers. -Ozan