Re: Red and blue (again)

At 21:06 +0100 28/7/05, David J. Pym wrote:
>>I certainly agree with you that mathematical/conceptual/application 
>>naturality is what matters, and I'm not missing anything here 
>>because I didn't even try to argue about that.
>
>What?  That's *exactly* what I *did* say! Go figure.

(Aaargh, English!) I meant: mathematical/conceptual/application 
naturality matters and I won't argue about that. (Just for the sake 
of precision.)

>>However, order matters a lot.
>
>Not even slightly.

A lot. (You have no chance in being more childish than me, give up.)

-Alessio