Re: Metrics for OSS performance
James Howison <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:58:05 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.opensource.community |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jan 19, 2004, at 10:24 AM, Jorge wrote: > Does anyone know of any reference with a good (valid > and reliable) mesure of "performance of Open Source > Software"? This is an interesting question and AFAIK there isn't a canonical answer. Kevin Crowston, Hala Annabi and I presented a paper on a related topic at ICIS late last year. It is a survey of success measures which I think will be of use to you. I just realized that this wasn't posted to opensource.mit.edu which I'll do now. Meanwhile the project and paper is available here: http://crowston.syr.edu/floss/ Is performance the same as success? Not exactly, but some of the issues (and probably measures) are the same. And this is something that I want to add to the Success Paper. Measuring success is hugely dependent on the goals of of the one doing the measuring. In Proprietary software development this defining power rested almost wholly with the Executive management, who largely relied on the advice of accounts. While commercial performance is still relevant in FLOSS projects the cross-institutional nature of FLOSS means that the power to define success lies much more directly with the developers. I think that any definition or measure of performance will need to take into account this element. Please keep in touch because performance is of great interest to us as well. Best regards, James Howison -- PhD Student Information Studies Syracuse University
PGP.sig
(application/pgp-signature, 194 B) - not displayed