Re: Good Explanations Question

Rami Rustom <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.physics.fabric-of-reality
Message-ID <CAChhRtPt=qa1Wu5GzThzkVnmsG25CrHw9K-NdhcMBzQsMJa2LQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Oct 22, 2012 4:55 PM, "hibbsa" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi - I was recently in an exchange with a friend who has read all the
> Popper books, as to whether when Popper says that there are an infinite
> number of explanations for any given observable (or whatever), he is
> talking about "Good" explanations. As in Popper-Good, explanations.
> This is what my friend thinks, and I do respect his POV a lot. But it
> doesn't make sense to me at all. How could there be an infinite number
> of Good Explanations for the same observable? If someone can help me out
> it'll be appreciated.

I don't think there are an infinite number of good explanations for a
given observable.

I think there are an infinite number of explanations for a given
observable. Why infinite? Because its about the logically-possible
explanations, rather than, for example, the explanations that
correspond with reality (aka good explanations).

-- Rami
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.