Re: Good Explanations Question
Rami Rustom <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.physics.fabric-of-reality |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAChhRtPt=qa1Wu5GzThzkVnmsG25CrHw9K-NdhcMBzQsMJa2LQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Oct 22, 2012 4:55 PM, "hibbsa" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi - I was recently in an exchange with a friend who has read all the > Popper books, as to whether when Popper says that there are an infinite > number of explanations for any given observable (or whatever), he is > talking about "Good" explanations. As in Popper-Good, explanations. > This is what my friend thinks, and I do respect his POV a lot. But it > doesn't make sense to me at all. How could there be an infinite number > of Good Explanations for the same observable? If someone can help me out > it'll be appreciated. I don't think there are an infinite number of good explanations for a given observable. I think there are an infinite number of explanations for a given observable. Why infinite? Because its about the logically-possible explanations, rather than, for example, the explanations that correspond with reality (aka good explanations). -- Rami