Re: The Ayn Rand World
Alan Forrester <alanmichaelforrester-gM/[email protected]> Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:43:39 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.physics.fabric-of-reality |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9 Feb 2013, at 20:00, George Simpson <[email protected]> wrote: > Rand failed to understand that we are not self-constructed, but rather we > construct our minds on the lattice of concepts that history provides us and > others introduce us to. This is unclear. Other people introduce you to concepts? I should think that some particular individuals introduce you to concepts by talking to you or writing books or whatever. > The individual can make a contribution to that lattice of concepts - what one might call the "conceptual field", but it is imbalanced to insist that the individual is all-important. Is there anything other than an individual that makes a contribution to the "lattice of concepts"? Suppose you go into a meeting and a bunch of people are talking. Is there some system in the room that creates ideas that isn't a subsystem of the brain of some particular person? Do you agree or disagree with the arguments at these links? http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/individualism.html http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/trader_principle.html Alan